xiaomi mi note 10 vs oppo find x2 neo

Comparativade carácteristicas, rendimiento, diseño, batería, cámara de fotos y conectividad entre los siguientes móviles: Oppo Find X2 Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. La información completa de especificaciones para decidir cual comprar. VS Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G. Oppo Find X2 Neo. Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.55-inch Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G) that was released on March 29, 2021, against the Oppo Find X2 Neo, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and came out 12 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs OppoFind X2 Neo - Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max karşılaştırma sonucu hangi telefon özellikleri daha iyi. Kategoriler Akıllı Telefonlar Akıllı Saatler Laptop ve Notebook Fotoğraf Makineleri Tablet Televizyonlar Arabalar Parfüm. AnaSayfa; Telefon Karşılaştırma; Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max Toplam Puan: 15 %7 Daha İyi. Oppo Find X2 Neo Toplam Puan: 14. Oppo Protegetu Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 con las nuevas fundas de diseño y combínalo con nuestros accesorios originales de la Casa de las Carcasas. Haz tu pedido y Recíbelo GRATIS en 48 horas. OppoFind X2 Neo Xiaomi Xioami Mi Note 10 Lite; Sistema operativo: Android 10.0 : Android 10.0 : GPU: Qualcomm Adreno 620 : Qualcomm Adreno 618 : Procesador: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Móviles con procesador Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 Móviles con procesador Qualcomm Snapdragon 730: Frecuencia: 2.4 GHz : Salle De Sport Lieu De Rencontre. 7 L'Oppo Find X2 Lite est un smartphone de milieu de gamme qui se veut le plus abordable du catalogue 5G d'Oppo. Il apparaît aussi comme une alternative au Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, vendu encore moins cher. Présentation Dans la famille des Oppo Find X2, le petit dernier n’est autre que le Find X2 Lite, un smartphone 5G qui se veut l'un des plus abordables du marché, vendu 50 € de plus que le Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite. Pour 449 €, le X2 Lite propose un écran Amoled de 6,4 pouces, un SoC Snapdragon 765G, 8 Go de RAM, un stockage interne de 128 Go et une batterie de 4 025 mAh. Le bloc photo comprend 4 modules, dont un grand-angle de 48 Mpx, un ultra grand-angle de 8 Mpx, et des capteurs noir et blanc et de profondeur de 2 Mpx. Une fiche technique allégée qui lui permettra sans doute d'attirer un plus large public. Ergonomie et design Les Oppo Find X2 Pro et Neo misent beaucoup sur le design, présentant notamment un écran aux bords incurvés qui à tendance à marquer son appartenance à un catalogue premium. La proposition faite par le Find X2 Lite est plus sobre, mais pas vraiment moins qualitative. Le smartphone offre une dalle plate, avec une caméra logée dans une encoche au format goutte d’eau. Le ratio d’occupation de la façade atteint 84,3 %, avec un menton certes un peu Find X2 Lite propose un dos en verre protégé par du verre Gorilla Glass 5 — comme ses aînés — et aux bords incurvés. La prise en main est donc globalement similaire, à ceci près que ce mobile a des dimensions plus réduites 160,3 x 74,3 x 8 mm et un poids plus restreint 180 g. Le cerclage du mobile est fait d’aluminium, proposé dans le même coloris Moonlight Black que la coque. Un coloris d’ailleurs très élégant… et très la connectique, le Find X2 Lite s’appuie sur un port de charge USB-C, deux emplacements nanoSIM et une prise mini-jack 3,5 mm. Un lecteur d’empreintes digitales se cache sous l’écran, et le terminal embarque une puce NFC, un capteur gyroscopique, mais pas d’emplacement microSD. Notez aussi que contrairement au Neo, ce Lite ne propose qu'un haut-parleur, dommage pour le rendu audio Find X2 Lite propose une prise mini-jack de bonne qualité. Sa puissance est très correcte 103 mVrms et sa distorsion contenue à 0,002 %. La plage dynamique est bonne avec 96 dB, tandis que les mesures de diaphonie sont dans la moyenne. Valeurs Moyenne Niveau de sortie 103 mVrms 116,3 mVrms Distorsion+Bruit 0,002 % 0,081 % Plage Dynamique 96 dB 91 dB Diaphonie -55 dB -54,7 dB Écran Cet Oppo Find X2 Lite propose donc un écran Amoled de 6,4 pouces, à la définition de 1 080 x 2 400 pixels sur un format 209. Contrairement aux X2 Pro et Neo, le Lite bénéficie d’une dalle plate plus classique, avec un taux de rafraîchissement de 60 Hz. Un tour dans les paramètres d’affichage permet de calibrer cet écran de meilleure manière qu’en sortie de boîte. Il faut pour cela opter pour l’affichage doux, et sélectionner le mode chaud. Colorimétrie Delta E = 2 Ainsi, cet écran possède une luminosité maximale de 570 cd/m², plus importante que sur les deux autres mobiles de la lignée, et une luminosité minimale de 2,4 cd/m² qui permettra une consultation de nuit suffisamment confortable. La température de couleur est de 6 352 K, le delta E est de 2, et le contraste tend évidemment vers l’infini grâce à la technologie Amoled. Seul le taux de reflets est un peu élevé 49,8 % tandis que le retard tactile est de seulement 40 ms. Performances Comme le Find X2 Neo, le Find X2 Lite s’appuie sur une puce mobile Snapdragon 765G, compatible avec la 5G, et qui se destine à des mobiles orientés gaming. Ce SoC est ici associé à 8 Go de mémoire RAM, bien suffisant pour offrir une fluidité de premier ordre à ce mobile. Justement, les tests multitâches sont sensiblement analogues à ceux du Neo, avec un indice qui atteint 100 et place ce mobile au même niveau que des Find X2 Pro, Huawei P40 ou Xperia 1 S765G se comporte très bien en jeu, où l’indice atteint 85. Il peut être rehaussé en optant pour le mode hautes performances, qui ne servira pas au commun des mortels. Il est intéressant de noter qu’à puce équivalente, mais avec 2 Go de RAM en plus, le Oppo Find X2 Lite se montre plus véloce que le Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite. C’est particulièrement le cas en jeu où le smartphone de Xiaomi obtient un indice de tests de performance sont réalisés avec viSer, l’application développée par la société SmartViser. Photo On le disait en préambule de ce test, l'Oppo Find X2 Lite s’équipe d’un bloc photo comprenant 4 modules, dont un grand-angle de 48 Mpx, un ultra grand-angle de 8 Mpx, et des capteurs noir et blanc et de profondeur de 2 Mpx. Seuls les deux premiers seront donc “utiles” au principal éq. 26 mm, f/ le Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, l'Oppo Find X2 Lite embarque un appareil photo principal de 48 Mpx, qui utilise par défaut une configuration de 12 Mpx. Avec le capteur principal, les résultats obtenus par le X2 Lite sont plus séduisants que ceux du Mi 10 Lite, grâce à un rendu plus chaud et plus agréable, et moins d’accentuations et de contraste. Les deux mobiles proposent pourtant un niveau de détails équivalent. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite eq 26 mm, f/ ISO 71, 1/50 Oppo Find X2 Lite eq 26 mm, f/ ISO 332, 1/100 De nuit, c’est la même chose. Le rendu X2 Lite se veut plus net, et la colorimétrie de l’image est plus neutre. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite eq 26 mm, f/ ISO 4994, 1/14 Oppo Find X2 Lite eq 26 mm, f/ ISO 6784, 1/14 Mode 48 MpxEn 48 Mpx, la tendance est en revanche moins flagrante le Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite se montre plus précis que par défaut. Avec le X2 Lite, le mode 48 Mpx n’apporte pas une plus-value évidente. On apprécie encore une fois le rendu plus juste du smartphone d'Oppo. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite eq 26 mm, f/ ISO 76, 1/50 Oppo Find X2 Lite eq 26 mm, f/ ISO 328, 1/100 Oppo Find X2 Lite 48 Mpx Oppo Find X2 Lite 12 Mpx Capteur ultra grand-angle 8 Mpx, éq. 13 mm, f/ matière d’ultra grand-angle, le Find X2 Lite se contente de peu. Comparé à un Mi 10 Lite, les clichés obtenus manquent de netteté, et la colorimétrie est même à l’avantage du smartphone de Xiaomi. De nuit, les clichés issus du X2 Lite sont presque inexploitables. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite eq 15 mm, f/ ISO 85, 1/50 Oppo Find X2 Lite eq 13 mm, f/ ISO 144, 1/60 Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite eq 15 mm, f/ ISO 4798, 1/14 Oppo Find X2 Lite eq 13 mm, f/ ISO 6112, 1/12 Autonomie Comme le X2 Neo, l'Oppo Find X2 Lite est équipé d'une batterie de 4 025 mAh. Sur le Neo, cet accumulateur permet de tenir environ 17 h, et l'on s'attendait peu ou prou aux mêmes performances sur ce X2 Lite. C'est bien le cas puisqu'on mesure 16 h 59 min d'endurance avec notre protocole. Dans ce domaine, Oppo aura du mal à faire de l'ombre à la concurrence puisqu'un Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite permet par exemple de tenir 20 h 6 min, et qu'un Realme X2 Pro atteint même 20 h 22 la charge, le X2 Lite se base sur une charge de 30 W, qui permet de redonner toute sa forme au mobile en 1 h 17 min tests de batterie sont automatisés par viSer, l’application développée par la société SmartViser. Les résultats obtenus avec viSer sont issus de mesures effectuées en conditions réelles d’utilisation appels, SMS, vidéos, lancement d’applications, navigation web…. Durabilité Notre score de durabilité permet de déterminer l'aspect durable du smartphone autant pour le consommateur que pour l'environnement. Il s'appuie à la fois sur l'indice de réparabilité, des critères de durabilité indice de protection, connecteurs standards, durée de garantie et des mises à jour... et une évaluation des politiques RSE Responsabilité sociétale des entreprises. Vous trouverez tous les détails de l'analyse dans notre article présentant le score de durabilité. Points forts Écran de très bonne facture. Un design sobre, efficace, élégant. Un appareil photo principal convaincant. Points faibles Une autonomie moins impressionnante que celle des concurrents. Un haut-parleur mono. Pas d'étanchéité. Conclusion Note globale Comment fonctionne la notation ? Sur le marché des téléphones 5G, une petite bataille a déjà lieu pour savoir qui proposera le mobile compatible le moins cher. Xiaomi est devant avec son Mi 10 Lite, et Oppo propose une alternative avec son Find X2 Lite. Le Find X2 Lite se montre très bon dans à peu près tous les domaines. D'abord, son ergonomie est ici simplifiée, mais respire la qualité. Son écran est excellent une fois bien calibré depuis les paramètres d'affichage, ses performances ne sont pas très éloignées des cadors du marché, et sa partie photo est maîtrisée. Même l'autonomie se montre satisfaisante, ce qui offre un bilan très homogène à ce terminal. Les consommateurs très attachés au soin apporté à la partie photo pourraient se tourner vers ce X2 Lite. À l'inverse, la recherche de la plus solide autonomie pourra orienter le public vers le Mi 10 Lite. Sous-Notes Ergonomie et design Écran Performances Photo Autonomie Durabilité OPPO a frappé très fort avec le lancement du Find X2 Pro, certainement le meilleur smartphone Android du moment. Juste après, la marque a enfoncé le clou en présentant deux modèles plus abordables, les Find X2 Neo et Lite. Chacun de ses trois modèles se place comme une référence dans sa catégorie, et ils sont tous vendus chez Boulanger OPPO Find X2 Pro à 1199€ OPPO Find X2 Neo à 699€ OPPO Find X2 Lite à 449€ OPPO, nouvel acteur du segment premium Après une arrivée en France remarquée il y a plusieurs années, la gamme Find X2 renforce une position de plus en plus solide sur le marché du smartphone. Testé par nos soins, le OPPO Find X2 Pro a reçu l’une des meilleures notes des smartphones en 2020, avec 9,3 sur 10. Vendu 1199€, il est le smartphone haut de gamme par excellence. Ses caractéristiques techniques ne trompent pas avec un superbe écran AMOLED de 6,7 pouces, le SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 le plus puissant sur Android et 12 Go de RAM. Ajoutez à cela 512 Go de stockage, et un triple capteur arrière reconnu pour sa qualité, et vous avez un smartphone qui coche toutes les cases de ce que l’on attend d’un haut de gamme en 2020. Mais OPPO ne veut pas seulement conquérir le segment premium et propose deux autres modèles tout aussi intéressants. Le OPPO Find X2 Neo, vendu 699€ ne manque pas non plus de qualité. Design élégant, interface léchée, bonne autonomie, système de recharge très rapide et écran réussi. Ajoutons à cela une très bonne qualité photo et on obtient l’un des smartphones les plus complets de sa catégorie. Pour les budgets plus serrés, OPPO propose le Find X2 Lite. Vendu 449€, il est le smartphone le plus compact des trois avec son écran de 6,4 pouces. Il utilise le même processeur que le Find X2 Neo, à savoir le Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G, couplé à 8 Go de RAM et 128 Go de stockage. Il est un choix idéal si vous cherchez un smartphone à moins de 500€. Point fort des trois modèles, ils sont tous compatibles 5G, vous serez donc prêts pour l’arrivée de la technologie en France. Pourquoi commander chez Boulanger L’une des forces de Boulanger, c’est son réseau de magasin dans toute la France. Commander sur le site web vous permet donc de réserver le produit, et de le retirer en magasin sous une heure. Pas besoin donc de vous déplacer pour rien. Si vous n’avez pas de magasin à proximité, la livraison est offerte pour toute commande d’un des modèles OPPO présentés dans cet article. Vous bénéficiez également de 15 jours de délai de rétractation pour retourner le téléphone si vous n’êtes pas satisfait. Si vous hésitez par exemple entre le OPPO Find X2 Pro et le Neo, cela peut être très utile. Profiter de l’offre En partenariat avec Boulanger VS Here we compared two mid-range smartphones the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro with Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G that was released on March 4, 2021, against the Oppo Find X2 Lite, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets. DifferencesReviewSpecsBenchmarksBattery lifeCameraComments Key differences An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Water-resistant body IP53 classificationHigher display refresh rate – 120 HzComes with 995 mAh larger battery capacity 5020 vs 4025 mAhExpandable storage via MicroSD card up to 512GBMore recent OS version Android 12 versus 10Slow-motion recording at 960FPSStereo speakersDelivers 15% higher peek brightness 719 against 626 nitsThe phone is 11-months newerHas a built-in infrared port Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X2 Lite Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks Review Display Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Battery Battery life, charging type and speed Camera Photo and video recording quality Connectivity Networks, ports, data transmission NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Value for money You can enter your local price of these phones in USD or any other currency and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tests and specifications Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Display Type AMOLED AMOLED Size inches inches Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels Aspect ratio 209 209 PPI 395 ppi 408 ppi Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz Max rated brightness 450 nits 430 nits Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits - HDR support Yes, HDR10 No Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Screen-to-body ratio Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - Always-On Display - DC Dimming Display tests RGB color space 100% PWM 490 Hz 247 Hz Response time ms ms Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity Peak brightness test auto Sources NotebookCheck [3], [4] Design and build Height 165 mm inches mm inches Width mm inches mm inches Thickness mm inches mm inches Weight 193 gramm oz 180 gramm oz Waterproof IP53 No Rear material Glass Glass Frame material Plastic Metal Colors Gold, Gray, Blue White, Black Fingerprint scanner Yes, in home button Yes, in-display Performance Tests of Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Lite in the benchmarks SoC Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Max. clock 2300 MHz 2400 MHz CPU cores 8 2 + 6 8 1 + 1 + 6 Architecture - 6 cores at GHz Kryo 470 Silver Cortex-A55- 2 cores at GHz Kryo 470 Gold Cortex-A76 - 6 cores at GHz Kryo 475 Silver Cortex-A55- 1 core at GHz Kryo 475 Gold Cortex-A76- 1 core at GHz Kryo 475 Prime Cortex-A76 L3 cache 1 MB - Lithography process 8 nanometers 7 nanometers Graphics Adreno 618 Adreno 620 GPU clock 810 MHz 750 MHz FLOPS ~435 GFLOPS ~700 GFLOPS Memory RAM size 6, 8 GB 8 GB Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory clock 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Channels 2 2 Storage Storage size 64, 128 GB 128 GB Storage type UFS UFS Memory card MicroSD No Memory card max. size Up to 512 GB - Benchmarks Geekbench 5 Single-Core CPU 100690 108358 GPU 97646 102982 Memory 51265 74220 UX 99177 88043 Total score 348657 370585 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 99% - Graphics test 6 FPS - Graphics score 1116 - PCMark score 8508 - Sources 3DMark [3] Software Operating system Android 11 Can be upgraded to Android 12 Android 10 ROM MIUI 13 ColorOS 7 OS size 13 GB 22 GB Battery Specifications Capacity 5020 mAh 4025 mAh Charge power 33 W 30 W Battery type Li-Po Li-Po Replaceable No No Wireless charging No No Reverse charging No No Fast charging Yes 50% in 30 min Yes, VOOC 50% in 20 min Full charging time 121 hr 050 hr Battery life tests Web browsing 1011 hr - Watching video 1400 hr - Gaming 0530 hr - Standby 74 hr - Camera Specs and camera test of smartphones Main camera Matrix 108 megapixels 48 megapixels Image resolution 12032 x 9024 8000 x 6000 Zoom Digital Digital Flash LED Dual LED Stabilization Digital Digital 8K video recording No No 4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS 1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS Slow motion 960 FPS 1080p 240 FPS 720p Angle of widest lens 118° 116° Lenses 4 108 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP 4 48 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP Wide main lens - 108 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 26 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung S5KHM2 ISOCELL Plus CMOS - Phase autofocus - 48 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 26 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Sony IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS - Phase autofocus Ultra-wide lens - 8 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 13 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Sony IMX355 CMOS - 8 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 13 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ CMOS Monochrome lens - - 2 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung S5K3M5 ISOCELL CMOS Macro lens - 5 MP - Aperture f/ - Sensor 1/5", Omnivision OV5675 - Phase autofocus - Depth lens - 2 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron - 2 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro from DxOMark - Selfie camera Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels Image resolution 4608 x 3456 6550 x 4928 Aperture f/ f/ Focal length - 26 mm Pixel size 1 microns microns Sensor type Exmor-RS CMOS ISOCELL CMOS Sensor size 1/ 1/ Video resolution 1080p Full HD at 30 FPS 1080p Full HD at 30 FPS DxOMark camera tests Connectivity Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 6 a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display Bluetooth version Bluetooth features LE, HID, A2DP LE, A2DP USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C USB version 2 2 USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS NFC* Yes Yes Infrared port Yes No Network Number of SIM* 2 2 Type of SIM card Nano Nano Multi SIM mode Standby Standby eSIM support* No No Hybrid slot No No LTE Cat* 15 20 5G support No Yes Sound Speakers Stereo Mono Headphone audio jack Yes Yes FM radio Yes No Dolby Atmos Yes Yes Other Category Mid-range Mid-range Announced March 2021 April 2020 Release date March 2021 June 2020 SAR head W/kg - SAR body W/kg - Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint *Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country. Conclusion If the display, software, camera, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. But if the performance and connectivity are more of a priority – go for the Oppo Find X2 Lite. Cast your vote So, which phone would you choose? Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 3 100% Total votes 3 Related comparisons You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below The Find X3 Lite is the more affordable, lower-specification model in Oppo’s Find X3 smartphone line. Phone specifications include a AMOLED display with FHD+ resolution and 90 Hz refresh rate, a Snapdragon 765G processor with 8 GB RAM and 128 GB storage, as well as a 4300 mAh battery with 65W fast charging. The device also boasts a quad rear camera setup, including a 64 MP main sensor, 8 MP ultra-wide module, 2 MP macro camera, and a 2 MP mono sensor. For video, the Find X3 Lite supports resolution up to 2160p/30fps, with slow-motion 1080p/120fps and 720p/240fps, as well as EIS video stabilization. Let’s find out how the Oppo Find X3 Lite ranks in our database of smartphone image quality. Key camera specifications Primary 64 MP sensor, 80° FOV, f/ lens with closed-loop focus motor Ultra-wide 8 MP sensor, 119° FOV, f/ lens Macro 2 MP sensor, 89° FOV, f/ lens Monochrome 2 MP sensor, 89° FOV, f/ lens 2160p/30 fps, 1080p/120 fps, 720p/240 fps video 1080p tested EIS video stabilization About DXOMARK Camera tests For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here. Test summary Oppo Find X3 Lite 105 camera 80 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 95 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 95 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 89 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 61 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 59 Best Google Pixel 6 77 26 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 55 Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 48 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 68 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 31 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 80 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 87 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 87 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 63 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 78 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 77 Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Best Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 84 84 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 Position in Global Ranking 101st 5. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 137 10. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 133 14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 131 14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Exynos 131 14. Vivo X70 Pro MediaTek 131 21. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max 130 30. Samsung Galaxy S22+ Exynos 126 30. Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 126 30. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos 126 34. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 124 34. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G 124 37. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 123 42. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 121 42. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Exynos 121 44. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Snapdragon 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G Exynos 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Exynos 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Exynos 120 44. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Snapdragon 120 53. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G Snapdragon 119 53. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Snapdragon 119 56. Apple iPhone SE 2022 118 56. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G 118 56. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Exynos 118 62. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 117 66. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G Exynos 116 66. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Exynos 116 66. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G Exynos 116 70. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Exynos 115 78. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Snapdragon 112 89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G 109 89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 109 91. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ 108 98. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 106 101. Motorola Edge 20 Pro 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G 105 111. Apple iPhone SE 2020 103 114. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 102 114. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 102 120. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G 97 122. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G 95 124. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 92 127. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 89 128. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G 88 128. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 88 128. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022 88 132. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 87 Position in High-End Ranking 12th 3. Apple iPhone SE 2022 118 12. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 105 12. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 105 18. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 102 22. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G 88 23. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 87 Pros Accurate target exposure in indoor photos and videos Pleasant color rendering in outdoor and indoor photos Neutral white balance in outdoor and indoor videos Generally accurate autofocus in photos Acceptable noise in outdoor videos Cons Low target exposure and limited dynamic range in low-light photos Visible noise in all photos Low detail in most photos and videos Color quantization artifacts often visible in photos Exposure instabilities in some videos Video autofocus failures sometimes visible in all tested conditions With a DXOMARK Camera score of 105, the Oppo Find X3 Lite lands in the second tier of our smartphone rankings overall. However, the Find X3 is in joint fifth place in the high-end category of devices priced between $400-599. The Oppo Find X3 Lite captures generally accurate target exposures with vivid and pleasant color in outdoor images. The Find X3 Lite has a global score comparable to the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s. The X3 Lite performed slightly better against the X2 Neo in the Photo category, but the X2 Neo was better for Zoom thanks to its tele module as well as for video. The Find X3 Lite is 10 points lower than the newer and slightly more expensive Find X3 Neo. Compared to the Samsung A52 5G, the Find X3 Lite scores 3 points higher overall because of better performances for the main camera and for video. It has a lower Zoom score, however. Compared to the similarly priced Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, the Find X3 Lite scores 6 points lower overall. The Xiaomi is 10 points ahead in the Photo category and 6 points ahead for Video. The Find X3 Lite does fare slightly better for Zoom, however, thanks to marginally better quality tele-lens shots. Below you can find a detailed analysis and image samples for all Photo, Zoom, and Video sub-attributes, as well as comparisons with such alternative devices as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, the Oppo Find X2 Neo, the Oppo Find X3 Neo, and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Photo The Oppo Find X3 Lite achieves a Photo score of 108. In this section, we take a closer look at each sub-attribute and compare image quality against competitors. Exposure and Contrast Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 In these tests we analyze target exposure, contrast, and dynamic range, including repeatability across a series of images. Tests are undertaken in a wide range of light conditions, including backlit scenes and low light down to 1 lux. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s target exposure performance under different lighting conditions in the lab. Target exposure is accurate in outdoor and indoor conditions, but a little underexposed in low light, where the competitors are better. The Samsung A52 5G has very similar behavior indoors and outdoors, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G overexposes a little outdoors. Color Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 In these tests we analyze color rendering, skin tones, white balance, and color shading, including repeatability across a series of images. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s color performance in an indoor scene. Oppo Find X3 Lite, vivid and pleasant color indoors Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, skin tones aren’t quite as natural Autofocus Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 In these tests we analyze autofocus accuracy and shooting time, including repeatability, in the lab. We test focus failures, depth of field, and tracking of moving subjects using perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s autofocus performance and depth of field in an indoor group portrait. Oppo Find X3 Lite, depth of field Oppo Find X3 Lite, crop good sharpness on faces at front and back Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, depth of field Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop good sharpness on face at front, slight softness on the face at back Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, depth of field Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop front face slightly out of focus, good sharpness on face at back Texture Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 In these tests we analyze texture on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s texture performance under different lighting conditions in the lab. The Oppo Find X3 Lite displays fairly low levels of texture in low light. but performs better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G using a tripod in bright light. Noise Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 In these tests we analyze noise on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples compare the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s photo noise performance under 1000 lux D65 lighting in the lab. Oppo Find X3 Lite, DXOMARK Camera test chart Oppo Find X3 Lite, crop visible noise Oppo Find X3 Neo, DXOMARK Camera test chart Oppo Find X3 Neo, crop slightly lower noise Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, DXOMARK Camera test chart Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, crop well-managed noise Bokeh Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 For these tests we switch to the camera’s bokeh or portrait mode and analyze depth estimation, bokeh shape, blur gradient, and repeatability, as well as all other general image quality attributes mentioned above. The score is derived from perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s bokeh simulation in an indoor scene. Oppo Find X3 Lite, bokeh mode Oppo Find X3 Lite, crop depth estimation errors Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, bokeh mode Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop depth estimation errors Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, bokeh mode Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop depth estimation errors Night Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 In these tests we shoot a selection of images in pitch-black darkness as well as with city lights in the background providing some illumination. We shoot sample images with the camera at default settings in both flash-auto and flash-off modes. We analyze all image quality attributes but we pay particular attention to exposure, autofocus, and color. We do not test night modes that have to be activated manually. This sample shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s night performance for portraits in flash-off mode. Oppo Find X3 Lite, flash-off Oppo Find X3 Lite, crop low target exposure, limited dynamic range with heavily clipped highlights Artifacts Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 In these tests we check images for optical artifacts such as vignetting, flare, lens softness in the corner, distortion, and chromatic aberrations, as well as for processing artifacts such as ghosting and fusion errors, hue shift, and ringing. This sample shows color quantization in a low-light scene. Oppo Find X3 Lite, artifacts Oppo Find X3 Lite, crop color quantization Preview Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 In these tests we analyze the image quality of the preview image and the differences between preview images and captured images, particularly in terms of exposure, dynamic range, and bokeh effect. We also check the smoothness of the field-of-view changes on the preview image when zooming with both buttons or when using the pinch-zoom gesture. These videos samples show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s image smoothness in preview when users perform a pinch-zoom operation compared to a competitor. Oppo Find X3 Lite, preview unstable image when switching between the ultra-wide and main cameras Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, preview improved stability between the ultra-wide and main cameras Zoom The Oppo Find X3 Lite achieves a Zoom score of 53. The Zoom score includes the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were achieved. Wide Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 In these tests we analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 to 20 mm. We look at all image quality attributes, but we pay particular attention to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s ultra-wide camera under indoor lighting conditions compared to the competition. Oppo Find X3 Lite, ultra-wide Oppo Find X3 Lite, crop low detail and visible noise Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, ultra-wide Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop improved detail with slightly visible noise Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, ultra-wide Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, improved detail with slightly visible noise Tele Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 In these tests we analyze all image quality attributes at focal lengths from approximately 40 to 300 mm, paying particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s tele performance at a medium-range zoom setting under lighting conditions in the lab compared to the competition. Oppo Find X3 Lite, medium-range zoom Oppo Find X3 Lite, crop low detail with slight noise Oppo Find X2 Neo, medium-range zoom Oppo Find X2 Neo, crop improved detail rendering Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, medium-range zoom Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, crop improved detail with slightly visible noise Video The Oppo Find X3 Lite achieves a Video score of 95. A device’s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of attributes in the same way as the Photo score. In this section, we take a closer look at these sub-scores and compare video image quality against competitors. In our Video tests we analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, and noise, but we also include such temporal aspects as speed, smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions. NOTE The sample video clips in this section are best viewed at 1080p resolution. Exposure and Contrast Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 This video shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s video exposure performance outdoors. Target exposure is generally accurate in outdoor conditions, but exposure instabilities are sometimes visible. Color Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 These video stills show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s video color indoors compared to the competition. Oppo Find X3 Lite, video still pinkish color cast Oppo Find X3 Neo, video still slight orange color cast Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, video still very slight orange color cast Autofocus Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 This sample clip shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s video autofocus performance in the lab under 1000 lux D65 lighting. Autofocus is generally smooth and stable in outdoor conditions, with only mild jerkiness occasionally visible during autofocus convergence. Texture Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s video texture performance under different light levels in the lab compared to the competition. Fine details are often lost in most tested conditions on the Oppo Find X3 Lite, which displays similar behavior to the Samsung A52 5G. The Oppo Find X3 Neo and the Xiaomi Mi11 Lite 5G perform better in all lighting conditions. Noise Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s spatial noise performance under different lighting conditions in the lab in handheld dotted line and tripod solid line tests compared to the competition. Spatial noise is visible in most tested conditions, with significantly higher levels compared to its competitors in most videos shot using a tripod. Artifacts Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Best Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 84 For video artifacts, we check for the same kinds of artifacts mentioned in the Photo section, along with such video-specific artifacts as frame rate variation in different light conditions, judder effect, and moving artifacts artifacts such as aliasing, color quantization, and flare can often be more intrusive when moving than in a still image. This video shows the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s hue shift artifacts in a low-light video. Hue shift artifacts are visible in the background around the lamp where highlight clipping occurs. Stabilization Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 In these tests we analyze residual motion when handholding the camera during recording, as well as when walking and running with the camera. We also look for stabilization artifacts such as jello effect, sharpness differences between frames, and frame shift abrupt changes of framing. These sample clips show the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s video stabilization in outdoor conditions compared to the competition. Oppo Find X3 Lite video, stabilization does not always activate by default in most tested conditions Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 5G video, some residual motion is visible Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro video, some residual motion is visible Sistema OperativoDisponibilitàDimensioniPesoPUNTEGGIQualità PrezzoHardware- Display- Fotocamera- PrestazioniRETESim CardDual SimGsmHSPA+LTE5GMax Download SpeedMax Upload SpeedDATI TECNICIProcessoreChipset64 BitGPURAMMemoria MaxMemoria EspandibileDISPLAYPolliciRisoluzioneDensità PixelTipoColoriProtezioneFOTOCAMERAMegapixelRisoluzioneDimensione SensoreAperture SizeStabilizzazioneAutofocusTouch FocusZoom OtticoFlashHDRGeo TaggingFace DetectionSmile DetectionFotocamera FrontaleVIDEOVideo Auto FocusVideo FpsVideo StabilizerSlow MotionStereo Sound RecFoto in VideoVideocamera FrontaleOpzioni Fotocamera FrontaleCONNETTIVITA'Wi-FiBluetoothUSBIRDANFCGPSSENSORIAccelerometroProssimitàGiroscopioBussolaBarometroImpronta DigitaleMic. di Riduzione RumoreFUNZIONIRadio FMVibrazioneVivavoceAltroBATTERIATipoAmpere 379 € Miglior Prezzo 379 € - 699 € Vedi le 4 offerte Android 10 ColorOS 72020/ x x mm171 / / / 107 / / 10NanoDual stand-byQuad Band 850/900/1800/19003700 Mbps1600 Mbps1x GHz Kyro 475 Prime + 1x GHz Kyro 475 Gold + 6x GHz Kyro 475 SilverSnapdragon 765G Qualcomm SDM765GAdreno 62012 GB256 x 2400 pixel402 ppiAMOLED16 milioniGorilla Glass 548 Mp + 13 Mp + 8 Mp + 2 Mp8000 x 6000 pixel1/ " + 1/ " + 1/ " + 1/5 "F + F + F + F / Digitale2 xDual LED32 Mp F 2160p30 fps240 fpsFull HD, 30fpsHDR/Face a/b/g/n/ac/ con LE/EDR/A2DP/aptXType-C DirectWi-Fi hotspotUSB OTGLiPo4025 mAh 499 € Miglior Prezzo 499 € - 899 € Vedi le 4 offerte Android 10 MIUI 112020/ x x mm208 / / / / / 10Nano-Quad Band 850/900/1800/19007500 Mbps3000 Mbps1x GHz Cortex A77 + 3x GHz Cortex A77 + 4x GHz Cortex A53Snapdragon 865 Qualcomm SDM865Adreno 6508 GB256 x 2340 pixel386 ppiAMOLED16 milioniGorilla Glass 5108 Mp + 13 Mp + 2 Mp + 2 Mp12000 x 9000 pixel1/ "F + F + F + F xDual LED20 Mp F 28K UHD30 fps960 fps-Full HD, 30fpsHDR/Face a/b/g/n/ac/ con A2DP/LE/aptXType-C DirectWi-Fi hotspotUSB OTGLiPo4780 mAh 459 € Miglior Prezzo 459 € - 509 € Vedi le 2 offerte Android 9 MIUI 11 Pie2019/ x x mm208 / / 107 / / 10NanoDual stand-byQuad Band 850/900/1800/1900800 Mbps150 Mbps2x GHz Kyro 470 Gold + 6x GHz Kyro 470 SilverSnapdragon 730G Qualcomm SDM730GAdreno 6186 GB128 x 2340 pixel398 ppiAMOLED16 milioniGorilla Glass 5108 Mp + 12 Mp + 5 Mp + 20 Mp + 2 Mp12000 x 9000 pixel1/ " + 1/ " + 1/3 " + 1/5 "F + F 2 + F 2 + F + F xQuad LED-32 Mp F 24K 2160p30 fps960 fps-Full HD, 30fpsHDR/Face a/b/g/n/ con A2DP/LE/aptXType-C DirectWi-Fi hotspotLiPo5260 mAh

xiaomi mi note 10 vs oppo find x2 neo